I'm the founder of Hereditary Programming ...

 I've always been recognized as an early pioneer in genetic programming, now they are calling what I did hereditary programming. Neato!

Scientific Imbeciles are at it again - Large Hadron Collider claims it produced matter from light

 Ah the imbeciles who govern science today.  Pathetic dim scurrulous savages.  

There are at least 17 utter falsehoods in this article. I leave the reader to find them. 

Lest I bore the accolates let's just discuss the basics. 

Two lasers intersecting do no create matter from nothing. 

aetherions get compressed into moebius loop type patterns by gravity which is vibration/toroid flow of the aether itself. So the two lasers meeting do not "create" matter out of nothing, they might simply be replicating the creation of matter as a star creates it. So think of matter as a locked zero loss state of energy that reciprocates upon itself. Higher gravities can lock more and more of these until you reach neptunium. So don't think of light as creating matter, or a GUT. The GUT is the aether itself and aetherions.

I don't know if they are quoting Griso or Tricco but both are utter imbeciles when they say - "W and Z bosons carry the weak force"

my brain hurts from your stupidity. Go away, just go away.

""Both photons and W bosons are force carriers, and they both carry the electroweak force," Griso says. "This phenomenon is really happening because nature is quantum mechanical."

My god the pain the pain. it BURNS!  The stupidity too powerful causing brain to ... explode

===============

The Large Hadron Collider plays with Albert Einstein's famous equation, E = mc2, to transform matter into energy and then back into different forms of matter. But on rare occasions, it can skip the first step and collide pure energy—in the form of electromagnetic waves.

Last year, the ATLAS experiment at the LHC observed two photons, particles of light, ricocheting off one another and producing two new photons. This year, they've taken that research a step further and discovered photons merging and transforming into something even more interesting: W bosons, particles that carry the weak force, which governs nuclear decay.

This research doesn't just illustrate the central concept governing processes inside the LHC: that energy and matter are two sides of the same coin. It also confirms that at high enough energies, forces that seem separate in our everyday lives—electromagnetism and the weak force—are united.

From massless to massive

If you try to replicate this photon-colliding experiment at home by crossing the beams of two laser pointers, you won't be able to create new, massive particles. Instead, you'll see the two beams combine to form an even brighter beam of light.

"If you go back and look at Maxwell's equations for classical electromagnetism, you'll see that two colliding waves sum up to a bigger wave," says Simone Pagan Griso, a researcher at the US Department of Energy's Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. "We only see these two phenomena recently observed by ATLAS when we put together Maxwell's equations with special relativity and quantum mechanics in the so-called theory of quantum electrodynamics."

"A magnet is one manifestation of electromagnetism, and electricity is another," Tricoli says. "But it's all electromagnetic waves, and we see this unification in our everyday technologies, such as cell phones that communicate through electromagnetic waves."

At extremely high energies, electromagnetism combines with yet another fundamental force: the weak force. The weak force governs nuclear reactions, including the fusion of hydrogen into helium that powers the sun and the decay of radioactive atoms.

Just as photons carry the electromagnetic force, the W and Z bosons carry the weak force. The reason photons can collide and produce W bosons in the LHC is that at the highest energies, those forces combine to make the electroweak force.

"Both photons and W bosons are force carriers, and they both carry the electroweak force," Griso says. "This phenomenon is really happening because nature is quantum mechanical."

theory of resonant aether and negative space

 first question: how do you move the aether

second question: what is resonance of the aether

third question: is a resonance possible between positive and negative space?

The question is does it occur in high di-electric fields at high harmonics a proturbation in atherions such that the field resonates in and out of negative space.  This zero point energy could then replace all cell phone sattelites as a kind of super radio without expanding waves. Or it can be a kind of tesla energy which can be retrieved with the correctly tuned receiver. 

This is a bit different than thermosphere excitement in resonant boosts. This is setting up a resonance in aether space itself.  The force would be like a pendulum with nothing to cause it to lose energy at each resonance end.  there is probably a size of the induced effect. first efforts might simply create one the size of a pea. Or what is the effect in standing in space induced into this effect, most likely deadly. 

So, if atoms cannot move the aether, nor can radiation, magnetism is caused by the proturbation so certainly it cannot cause movement.  It's a complex theory.

I find the theory of negative space pressures interesting. It's as if the proturburation moves inside and outside the space we recognize. the square root of -1 algebras and vector algebraics.  I think it's not N dimensional but rather, a space that is outside AETHER or where AETHER is not present. Thusly provide a space for more energy.  Perhaps at high energy, proturbation flows in torroid geomotry induce a low pressure or negative space.  The distance of two power lines theory of energy containment. Each is producing a negative pressure void with co-combines equidistant and then achieves a negative aether space for containment of what would otherwise produce a spark gap, a positive aether space where proturbation flow can move through. 

Dollard's Great Talk on the History of Electricity

watch all these and skip college:

What is Gravity?

 Gravity is climbing through aether torsions of torroidal ejections of aetherions turning themselves inside out over time.  a null point source proturbation in the aether inducing an effect we call acceleration.  deal with it. A magnet is simply a mostly unified direction of field inducing atomic torroidal compressions/rarefactions in materials of atomic composition which can be aligned in their torroidal ejection streams.  Like a jellyfish eating itself, the motion is an odd way to travel.

What is College?

 College is where dumb and smart people go. 

If you are a dumb person who goes to college you go there to learn from people who are smarter than you. 

If you are a smart person who goes to college you go there to learn from people who are dumber than you. 

Using Grammar to Develop Next Generation Language Systems

 There's so much excitement about the Neural Network implementations for understanding and finding answers in short paragraphs of text. Unfortunately this approach never scales very well. 

New attempts to add 10^19 parameters to encode it all still won't work. The reason why is that you really aren't understanding what is being said nor what is being said in the content. 

That's why we place our efforts into advanced grammar and sentence morphological analysis. This is different from Google Universal Sentence Encoder which is a N dimensional hyperspace.  When I tested these kinds of solutions they didn't do very well at all. 

We had a run in with someone with a statistics background who claimed that NLP didn't work as well. Yah, well what did they do? You always have to ask exactly what was tried. Simple part of speech? yah that doesn't work. 

Graph encoding morphological grammar is our state of the are technique but we don't stop there. We then apply a grammar transformation and world-map modeling as well as a few other things to map a conversation. I'm sure behind the scenes they are starting some of that at Google and Amazon but not qute all of it. They will always be handicapped by their core neural network approach. And I'm someone who's been a pioneer and believer in neural networks - for what they do well - for well over 30 years. I believe 1986 was my first one. 

The reason why most people don't use grammar is they don't know the theory and they aren't long time researchers in the NLP field.  It's a lot easier to get excited by the new stuff and believe thats the cool stuff. Well in some ways they are right, but not in accuracy, precision, or ability. Not yet. Maybe in ten years. They have to go through similar efforts in research. 

It can be frustrating running a language tech startup when others have a hard time understanding why what you are doing is better, until they see the results. Then it's just bang obvious. Fast. Precise. Great stuff. 

And that continues to get even better as we move into voice and conversational systems.  

Like Tesla, we build our company layer by layer, technology advance ontop of technology advance. 

Eventually we will arrive at very natural human seeming systems interacting with massive amounts of information and able to encode facts and world information in a fully autonomous form.  Maybe that's 2030.  But what other companies are striving for that? Not Amazon or Google, their approaches are intellectual dead ends, a party trick that does the basics well but won't scale.