Big Month for Books - Mind Bug, Quantum Lattice Theory

Lotsa new books out at Amazon this month:

Mind Bug: This is a pretty fun sci-fi book that will keep you engrossed

Quantum Lattice Theory: A great step in modern physics

ZIRP ZOMBIES: about THE BANing apocolypse.  Great if you are into financial theory

just go to amazon.com and type in "gianna giavelli" in the search!

The New Stephen Hawking Movie - Theory of Everything - Sucks

I hate the new stephen hawking movie. I hate it for many reasons. First and foremost, I hate it because the title is wrong. Stephen Hawking didn't posit a theory of everything. Its called the grand unified field theory, a concept too big for dumb Americans. He didn't even contribute to that concept or solve it! It was Einstein who hoped for a GUF not Hawking. But quantum mechanics forever dislodged the hope. And Hawking moved it not one iota further.

Second, I hate the movie because there was ALREADY a stephen hawking movie. A pretty good one - a brief history of time. Narrated by the real stephen hawking.

Third, I hate the movie because I don't think Hawking was such a great physicist. Sure they gave him the newton chair and a teaching position, but was that over published papers and quality of research, or because everyone felt sorry for him and his ALS disease? No one has to tell me how tragic these things are I've lived it. But it hardly makes for a brilliant physicist.

What about black holes. Hawking discovered black holes you scream. Actually, it really was pretty easy to deduce the concept once the article on the chandrasekhar or however you spell it limit was published. And Eddington was also keenly aware of their possibility.

What about the big bang theory?

"The Big Bang Theory is an American sitcom created by Chuck Lorre and Bill Prady, both of whom serve as executive producers on the show along with Steven .."

err sorry. That's what wikipedia says about it. 

Well there are many now who argue agasint big bang theory. 

Fahr set off to find a phenomenon that would naturally cause the universe to emanate a smooth microwave glow from all directions in space, like a glowing ember at a few degrees above absolute zero. He says he found one. “There was never a recombination event,” Fahr says of his model of the microwave background. “In my view [the microwave background] is just a kind of entropy feature of the cosmos as it is.”

In debating the interpretation of the cosmic microwave background, Fahr joins a long and distinguished line of heterodox astrophysicists, including the celebrated astronomers Halton Arp, Sir Fred Hoyle, and the Nobel Prize winner Hannes Alfvén. These skeptics have ascribed the microwave background to assortments of glowing clouds of gas, dust, and charged particles throughout the galaxy and nearby universe. These clumps of molecular interlopers, they claim, translate starlight bouncing around the universe into a quiet and dim bath of microwave light, a little bit like how the Earth’s atmosphere scatters blue sunlight to produce the daytime sky.

But it's not just big bang theory. or GuF. Hawking was challenged on black hole theory as well:

"It was at Erhard’s house in San Francisco in 1981 that Susskind and Hawking began their now infamous Black Hole War, which became the title of Susskind’s subsequent book. Hawking made the stunning claim that material which falls into a black hole disappears forever. If correct, it would mean that the fundamental laws of the universe would have to be rewritten. From the point of view of a quantum theorist, like Susskind, this was impossible: the central principle of quantum mechanics is that information can never be annihilated.

Susskind drove home preoccupied by Hawking’s claim. “I was trying to visualise the geometry of a black hole and the weather was so bad that the windshield was covered with frost. As the traffic slowed down, I drew the diagram on the frosted windshield with my finger. I was obsessed with it. I couldn’t see how what he said was right. On the other hand I couldn’t see anything wrong with it either.”

Thus two great theories of physics – general relativity, which describes gravity, and quantum mechanics, which describes everything else – began a heated tussle. In the end Susskind managed to prove the information sucked into a black hole is indeed conserved."

In the end I see Hawking as a smart man, sadly stricken, but a far leap from the greatest modern minds. I simply cannot list his accomplishments. His best work really is a brief history of time and his concept of cosmic eggs and time-universe moving itself along a path. This work in temporality is of course 100% theoretical and not so useful quite at the moment. 

Some Very Odd Things On The Virgin Birth

Mary Visits Elizabeth

³⁹ In those days Mary set out and went with haste to a Judean town in the hill country, ⁴⁰ where she entered the house of Zechariah and greeted Elizabeth. ⁴¹ When Elizabeth heard Mary’s greeting, the child leapt in her womb. And Elizabeth was filled with the Holy Spirit ⁴² and exclaimed with a loud cry, ‘Blessed are you among women, and blessed is the fruit of your womb. ⁴³ And why has this happened to me, that the mother of my Lord comes to me? ⁴⁴ For as soon as I heard the sound of your greeting, the child in my womb leapt for joy. ⁴⁵ And blessed is she who believed that there would be^[e] a fulfilment of what was spoken to her by the Lord.’


When I began to research the virgin birth, I was quite surprised that the only reference to it appears in Luke. What follows is conjecture and guess and pushes the story of the new testament. But it is fun to pursue non the less. 

So you have in Luke 1 the story of two women. Elizabeth, who is old. And an angel comes to her and says that the lord will provide her a son. And her husband Zechariah will not speak again until all this happens.  

Now, Paul makes an odd reference to the birth of Jesus, calling it an Abortion or Abortivo. The line in question is:

I Corinthians 15:3-8: "For I handed on to you as of first importance what I in turn had received: that Christ died for our sins in accordance with the scriptures, and that he was buried, and that he was raised on the third day in accordance with the scriptures, and that he appeared to Cephas, then to the twelve. Then he appeared to more than five hundred brothers and sisters at one time, most of whom are still alive, though some have died. Then he appeared to James, then to all the apostles. Last of all, as to one untimely born, he appeared also to me."

So at first I thought Abortion? Or, perhaps it was a cesarean section done in old times? No, it didn't seem right. By untimely born, Paul is referencing the advanced age in years of Elizabeth. 

The telling of the Tale of Luke sorta bears this out:
      Angel appears to Zechariah and fortells of great son named John
      Mary visits Elizabeth at six months of pregancy
      Mary asks the angel how she can give birth as a virgin
      Three months later Mary returns home (presumably after the birth of John)
      Mary has a child who she calls Jesus. 

Ok now this next part will astound you. Lets say that you were Mary and Joeseph afraid to have a child because of the persecution and census. And the elderly couple, too old to raise a new infant. What if after 3 months, the infant was brought back with Mary and Joeseph without Marys knowledge, then she awakens in the manger, with the infant beside her. a "birth" of an infant. She would have been amazed, but not question as it had been foretold to her by the angel Gabriel. 

The child's title is Jesus - Yashua. The Chrestos - the oracle of God. But his NAME his birth name, is John. 

Ok hold on. I know it sounds mad. But one phrase from Elizabeth sticks it: 


After those days his wife Elizabeth conceived, and for five months she remained in seclusion. She said, ²⁵ ‘This is what the Lord has done for me when he looked favourably on me and took away the disgrace I have endured among my people.’

So she was disgraced for getting pregnant so old. And went away for five months in seclusion. Then came back. But where is John?

Another hint - When Mary visits elizabeth in her sixth month of pregancy Elizabeth tells Mary

"And why has this happened to me, that the mother of my Lord comes to me? <sup>44

Very interesting indeed! So maybe at that point, Elizabeth KNOWS what is going to happen but Mary does not! Of course bible thumpers will say simply that it is a reference to Mary going to give birth to Jesus. But how would Elizabeth know anything about that Elizabeth was not supranatural and Mary was NOT PREGNANT!

56 And Mary remained with her for about three months and then returned to her home.

Six months pregnant, then THREE MONTHS MORE = BIRTH! This is not a coincidence!

Lets look at Mark 1.   Of course there is the statement that John baptized Jesus. But perhaps that is simply allegorical. Mark does not say he witnesses it. It begins with a description of JOHN as the wild man who is preaching and is arrested. 


Give me the head of John the Baptist here on a platter.” 9 Although King Herod was very sad, he had made a promise, and his dinner guests had heard him. So Herod ordered that what she asked for be done. 10 He sent soldiers to the prison to cut off John’s head. 11 And they brought it on a platter and gave it to the girl, and she took it to her mother - Matthew 14


Now, go back a little and you will find something amazing in Matthew:

At that time Herod, the ruler of Galilee, heard the reports about Jesus. 2 So he said to his servants, “Jesus is John the Baptist, who has risen from the dead. That is why he can work these miracles.”- Mathew 14:1-3

AHA!  AHA!!! Amazing. So they say it even in the bible! So what might have happend? A faked death. John (Jesus) is in prison and they arrange ANOTHER to take his place and death. Another head is given to Salome. Jesus/John escapes the prison or is released as another and then he has a problem. John has to be DEAD. So who will he be now? He remembers the tale of his birth and the name given to him by the angels and declares himself JESUS.

What does John 1 say about all this? 

6</sup> There was a man named John^[c] who was sent by God. ⁷ He came to tell people the truth about the Light so that through him all people could hear about the Light and believe. ⁸ John was not the Light, but he came to tell people the truth about the Light. ⁹ The true Light that gives light to all was coming into the world!
¹⁰ The Word was in the world, and the world was made by him, but the world did not know him. ¹¹ He came to the world that was his own, but his own people did not accept him. ¹² But to all who did accept him and believe in him he gave the right to become children of God. ¹³ They did not become his children in any human way—by any human parents or human desire. They were born of God.

So John as a prophet was not accepted by the Jews. He needed to reinvent himself as Jesus. And he knew that at some point this would need to happen. 

So Jesus was of the Bethany Clan, a rich family in the Gallilee Essene region. They had many houses and areas of land. 

When one reads John, we must distinguish between John the Baptist, and John the Apostle. The first part is a recount of John the Baptist. But it is not the direct witness of John. Here we hear the tale of John meeting Jesus:

The next day John saw Jesus coming toward him. John said, “Look, the Lamb of God,^[h] who takes away the sin of the world! ³⁰ This is the One I was talking about when I said, ‘A man will come after me, but he is greater than I am, because he was living before me.’ ³¹ Even I did not know who he was, although I came baptizing with water so that the people of Israel would know who he is.”

But really the DIRECT account of John does not happen until 

The First Followers of Jesus

³⁵ The next day John^[j] was there again with two of his followers. ³⁶ When he saw Jesus walking by, he said, “Look, the Lamb of God!”^[k]
37 The two followers heard John say this, so they followed Jesus. ³⁸ When Jesus turned and saw them following him, he asked, “What are you looking for?”
They said, “Rabbi, where are you staying?” (“Rabbi” means “Teacher.”)
³⁹ He answered, “Come and see.” So the two men went with Jesus and saw where he was staying and stayed there with him that day. It was about four o’clock in the afternoon.



Now. John goes to the baptism area and sees someone he recognizes as JESUS. Was this John? The person turns and doesn't say "Hi I am Jesus" he says "what are you looking for?"  

One of the first thing that happens is the amazement of Nethaniel. Nethaniel is AMAZED that Jesus knows who he is.

Philip was from the town of Bethsaida, where Andrew and Peter lived. ⁴⁵ Philip found Nathanael and told him, “We have found the man that Moses wrote about in the law, and the prophets also wrote about him. He is Jesus, the son of Joseph, from Nazareth.”
⁴⁶ But Nathanael said to Philip, “Can anything good come from Nazareth?”
Philip answered, “Come and see.”
⁴⁷ As Jesus saw Nathanael coming toward him, he said, “Here is truly an Israelite. There is nothing false in him.”
⁴⁸ Nathanael asked, “How do you know me?”
Jesus answered, “I saw you when you were under the fig tree, before Philip told you about me.”

Bethsaida is in Gallilee. So Jesus may have visited family as John and very well met or seen many people when he was younger. And he would have met many many of the more powerful families and their children being from the Bethany clan.  

If Jesus was an infant that just APPEARED by Mary one day, perhaps his utterance in Matthew 11:11 might make some more sense. Of himself, born of Elizabeth, as John, he was the greatest born of women. But as Jesus, of Mary, not born of women, he was the greatest of all.

¹¹ Truly I tell you, among those born of women no one has arisen greater than John the Baptist


Finally we have Herod Antipas who knew John the Baptist well, seeking out to see Jesus to dispel the myth that Jesus was the Ressurection of John! But Herod never meets Jesus! Not until much later!

Herod’s Perplexity

⁷ Now Herod the ruler^[b] heard about all that had taken place, and he was perplexed, because it was said by some that John had been raised from the dead, ⁸ by some that Elijah had appeared, and by others that one of the ancient prophets had arisen. ⁹ Herod said, ‘John I beheaded; but who is this about whom I hear such things?’ And he tried to see him. (Jesus)

and again:

Mark 6:14

[ The Death of John the Baptist ] King Herod heard of it, for Jesus’ name had become known. Some were saying, ‘John the baptizer has been raised from the dead; and for this reason these powers are at work in him.’   ... when Herod heard of it, he said, ‘John, whom I beheaded, has been raised.’
Herod is also upset that he was tricked by the three wise men. But what is their trick?

Matthew 2:16

[ The Massacre of the Infants ] When Herod saw that he had been tricked by the wise men, he was infuriated, and he sent and killed all the children in and around Bethlehem who were two years old or under, according to the time that he had learned from the wise men.

This is confusing until you realize that it is Father and son Herod being referred to, Herod, and Herod Antipas. 



Did the wise men pick up JOHN from Elizabeth and transfer him to Joseph and Mary as JESUS thus hiding the child? The plot thickens. The trick that the wise men performed on Herod is never called out!  So what was the trick? Does Herod say "Hey JOHN the Baptist, It's YOU I KNEW IT!" when they bring Jesus before him!

I think this doesn't happen because it is HEROD who knew John the Baptist, but it is his son Herod Antipas who presides at the time of crucifiction.  This explains why no one knows of him as John. 


It is interesting to put modern intrigue into this common tale and look at how well it illuminates much of many texts which just seen thrown out there and out of place. It ties much together. In the end, there is no knowing. 





 

 


 
 

 

Some

Chi Ro as Fish hook?

Some ancient hieroglyphics has me wondering if the chi ro is really just a symbol for a fish hook! below we see some very early christian hieroglyphics from the catacombs of Domitilla.

The Three Stars of the Sippar Tablet and Constantines Coin

The image of the 3 stars of the shamash have continued to be with us and were found on this coin from constantine's tribute, above the symbol of rome, the wolf suckling twins, are three stars. Amazingly, this goes all the way back to the sippar tablet from the 9th century. What is the meaning? At the time of Precession near a time we are approaching, we will have a secondary star appear, and many assume it is a lost binary companion. The intersection between the two stars will be either the moon, or an intersection pattern ala pisces vessica.

Here are some images for thought... The first a miedival zodiac is most interesting because at the center is christ along with the three stars.

 

One wonders if the Chi Ro key goes all the way back to 9th century BC Akkadian and Sumerian mythos. Here we see a similar version of it on an ancient tablet

 

Early Catacomb Drawings of Apostles Revealed In Rome

Did you know that the Roman Catacombs were not built to serve as secret churches? The Catacombs were truly just burial places. Just like today’s cemeteries which have chapels on-site, these early burial places also had built in chapels to perform the final blessing of a body before entombment. While Christians were persecuted at various times, they celebrated Mass in people’s homes, under the guise of a friendly gathering, and not in underground chapels.
Today the entrance to these early Christian burial sites are found in some of the most unexpected places. The Catacombs of St. Thecla, which I had the privilege of visiting Tuesday, are found in the basement of a building belonging to an Italian insurance company in a residential neighbourhood of Rome. No joking. Of course, the insurance company is a recent addition to the landscape.
The Catacombs of St. Thecla appear on pilgrimage maps as early as the seventh century. It’s believed there was a shrine to St. Thecla not far from today’s Basilica of St. Paul Outside the Walls, in the place Thecla was believed to have been buried. However, today it is not certain if the St. Thecla referred to was the virgin saint referred to in ancient legends.
It was in the 19th century that the Catacombs were rediscovered by archeologists.
Fast forward to 2008 when the Pontifical Commission for Sacred Archeology was attempting to restore a portion of the Catacombs. Most of the Catacombs are chambers with crypts all the way up the wall. It seems at some point there was a plague and large numbers of people needed to be buried all at once. Hence these mass crypt chambers that could then be sealed off. In one wing of the Catacombs, however, was a crypt that seemed to have housed only two bodies. It was this chamber that the Commission for Sacred Archeology wanted to restore. Generally a private crypt means a noble family, which means it was no doubt decorated. In fact, faints hints of frescoes were evident in this special crypt, referred to in archeological terms as a double cubiculum.
The conditions in the Catacombs are cool and very humid. The archeological team set out to restore the frescoes using mechanical processes to remove calcium lime buildup (the water in Rome is highly calcified, good for bones, bad for cleaning).
Then the team heard about lasers being used in the restoration of facades of churches and statues. The idea was floated, “why not try using a laser on this crypt?” So a special laser was brought in and modified to work in highly humid conditions.
According to Dr. Barbara Mazzei the laser works on tiny portions at a time. The beam hits the calcified material and causes a chemical reaction that produces a mini-explosion. That mini-explosion causes the calcium lime to fall off the surface of the fresco, revealing the original image.
Two years of work revealed four images that have been identified as images of the Apostles Peter, Paul, John and Andrew, as well as an image we would recognize as The Good Shepherd. Over the main entrance to the cubiculum one can see an image of what looks like hands outstretched around a table. The Twelve Apostles.
Over one of the actual burial slots there is a visible image of a woman in noble dress.
There’s one slight problem with this Catacomb. It’s very, very delicate. The area above the Catacombs is very moist and that constant exposure to humidity is damaging to the frescoes. As one archeologist told journalists, “we’ve got a choice, preserved Catacombs or pretty flowers” referring to the fact that there is a garden above one portion of the Catacomb and the water from the flower bed filters into the Catacombs. However, placing dehumidifiers in the Catacombs alters the delicate micro-environment and can cause a whole host of other problems.