Wednesday, January 29, 2014

SARC Announces Rescue Robots For Nuclear Disasters





1/29/2014

SARC, the Society for Advances and Research in Cybernetics has announced plans to develop robots capable of helping in Nuclear disasters.

"SARC Rescue units go where people cannot. For rescue in Space, Nuclear, Deep Sea, or Thermal disasters." - says SARC founder Gianna Giavelli.

The goal is to design units which are semi-autonomous. They use their own intelligence until they reach the critical situation when human operators take over and direct complex repairs or movements.

SARC Repair Cybertrons (SRCs) are not robots. Instead, as Cybertrons, they are cybernetic beings designed from the ground up to mirror humans skeleton, skin, sensory, visual, muscular, auditory, and brain systems. Other Robot systems look like clumsy machines. The SRC has the flexibility and nimbleness to do splits and gymnastics, flips and hand stands. This level of adaptability  is critical so that SRCs can traverse clumsy terrain and get around barriers in disasters. And move quickly and efficiently. If a human can do it, a SRC can also.

"Learning and real neural systems is a big part of the difference between a Cybertron and the clumsy robots we see from DARPA today." said Giavelli. "Modern robotics has gone down a path that is ugly, clunky, and inefficient. Cybernetics offers potential not just in creation of Cybertrons, but also in many areas that help humans such as cybernetic limb replacement, speech for the impaired, the list is endless."

Other Modern Robots: PetMan from Boston Dynamics (now Google), ASIMO, and a SARC prototype


Petman doesn't look very Human but does use balance. Petman uses servos and motors, big metal hinges for joints.




ASIMO, a wobbly pancake footed prototype robot has hands that can grasp




Robots like ASIMO move slowly and clumsily. Petman can run but looks more like the terminator than a human. The goal with SRCs is to move it to a whole new level of speed and gracefullness by using cybernetic principles both in physical design but also in brain design and sensor array processing. Cybernetic cognition is very different from what ASIMO is doing which is running one simple program. Cybernetic cognition is based on simulating hundreds of millions of neurons which have been trained to handle the tasks they encounter. This is done on chips which have 2,000 - 10,000 individual processing units. The technologies initially created to drive computer gaming now are applied to human braining.

A typical SRC installation consists of a body pod with four units, and a control pod with two control units used by human controllers when necessary. For example, in a nuclear reactor rescue, the SRC unit, loaded with operational blueprints and trained with the plants layout, intelligence to overcome obstacles and barriers, can enter into dangerous chambers. Once in position, a human takes over and  turns off valves, makes complex repairs, or simply uses the SRC for intelligence on the situation. With built in meters for heat, radiation, air quality, and standard tool kits, the SRC can take on complex tasks such as welding a plate over a broken nuclear containment pressure vessel, or working the boom to unload spent fuel rods. In space the SRC is the astronauts perfect companion able to go outside the space shuttle and re-attach that missing critical tile. For space station and sattelite repairs the SRC is key, and guided by a humans touch with sense feedback, delicate instruments and tiny wires can be repaired similar to remote surgery robotics.

Inside the CyberPod:
The cyberpod is the control station that lets humans take over once the SRC reaches its destination. Using commercial off the shelf COTS components like Occulus Rift 3-D headgear with motion capture, and robotic hand sleeves and gloves that the person inserts their arms into like remote surgery controls but more fluid, the operator is able to perform both delicate operations like surgery and skilled but more physical operations like lifting or welding. There is no walking control, simply talk to your SRC and point out where you would like to be. "SARK5 can you move closer to that gas pipe by the window?"  SARK5: "Will do!"  "Get a bit closer to the panel please" "Ok is this close enough"  The cyberpod concept is perfect human and Cybertron cooperation, a model we think is how it should be. While fully autonomous SRCs will no doubt get developed eventually, there is so much to do before we get there we believe strongly in the partially autonomous model. It's also much better than a full control model where really much of the magic is lost as humans are really just playing with a toy at that point.

Give Me Muscle!!!
Ahh Strength! Lifting, Running, Kicking. And breathing (yes Cybertrons breathe). Every other robotics company uses servo motors or hydraulic pressure lines. All very non-human ways of delivering motion. The SRCs muscles come from individual muscle fibers, carefully placed on top of bones and bundled together forming layers, sheaths, and bulges just like in humans. The control system may be thousands of times more complex, but it's also thousands of times more subtle and accurate as well. Our first synthetic muscle uses simple electromagnetic principles of perpendicular helicoids which attract when a small charge is applied. The muscle contracts. Put 100 of them together and you've got a bicep you can arm wrestle (and lose). Skinny slighter versions control face muscles. Why bother with this level of detail? I guess it's all part of the concept of a cybertron, something that is more completely in our world with ways of interacting and expressing and sensing that are closer to human.

Give Me A Voice To Sing!!!
Bi-labial fricatives. Glottal Stops. SRCs have them all. With a real air driven speech box and vocal cords. Consonents formed from the tongue and lips moving together. They also have an electronic internal voice for communicating over mobile or back to the CyberPod.  Laughter, tics, soft singing when bored, a real voice is one step closer to human. Is it overkill? Ask yourself who you want to talk to THOG the death machine or SARC5 who laughs at your jokes?                                                        

Cybernetic Language and Object Recognition:
Modeled on millions of neurons, SRCs have a surprisingly human linguistic response. Language is a big part of the SRC especially object identification and linguistic commands for operational motion.
SRC - "I hear something from the left side of the room, look the steam pipe is leaking"
SRC - "There's a person here, I can hear them breathing. Their heart is still beating. There is a lot of blood"  Human - "lift them over your shoulder and carry them out of there" SRC - "No problem, I'm designed to handle 300 pounds of lift!"

Summary
SRC is science fiction today and will take a lot of effort to bring it together. But all these technologies are viable and close, the problem is that the direction people have taken with robotics building big lumbering machines is way off track. In Japan, the few robots which are built gracefully are more like chuck-e-cheese animatrons with little real motion or function and no brains. What is needed is some new thinking and someone with the vision and skills to make it happen.

Technical Specification

Weight: 160 lbs self contained
Motion: Bi-Pedal Swing and Gymnastics
Motor Function: Synthetic Muscles wrapped in braided carbon nanotubes
Lift Ability: Able to lift 100 pounds
Torque: Able to generate 200 pounds of turning torque
Speed: Able to run on flat surface at 30 MPH for one hour
Distance: Able to traverse 20 miles
Charge: Able to operate for sixteen hours under low exertion  and three hours under load and stress

Design Targets:
    Able to perform a gymnastic tumble
    Able to do 20 pullups
    Able to throw a knife and hit a bullseye
    Able to vault over a 4' high barrier without loss in speed
    Able to climb a vertical ladder at human speed
    Able to jump over a 6' wide hole
    Able to work in 250 degree environments for 30 minutes
    Able to work in -40 C degree environments for 30 minutes
    Able to perform simple tasks autonomously for six hours
    Able to visually recognize faces and greet
    Able to shake hands
    Able to jump onto a board room desk and do a cartwheel
    Able to pinpoint where a sound is coming from (eg a steam leak hiss)
    Able to warn of approaching areas of high temperature or radiation                 

Tantalum-Hafnium-Carbide inner skeleton
       melting point 4,500 degrees celsius
Titanium Alloy Protectors -  form critical elements like skull, abdomin
Synthetic Tendons created from high temperature silicon with embedded carbon fiber
Synthetic Muscle Fibers - Individually attached and woven into bundles. No servo motors
Micro-Skin with embedded point by point touch, pressure, and heat sensors
Naturally aspirated voice using diaphram, air chamber, vocal resonator, and mouth position
Human like muscular definition bundles and fat definition pads provide proper shapes
Facial FlexiMuscular Substrate - Allows full human facial movement and expression but also critical for labial movements and vocal ability
Separate Abdominal and Cranial battery supplies LIPO-Air
Brain
     Vision support system - 5,000 processors Synapse Chip
     Cognitive support system - 10,000 processors dual Synapse Chips. Cranial Battery = LiFePO

     Emotive and Psychological Process, facial expression mgmt
     Neo-Cortex, basic motor control system - 6 dedicated dsp processors 
     touch monitoring system
     auditory monitoring system and pre-phonic analysis
     fast motor learned stability and gymnastic system
     fast twitch emergency response system 

Weight of Components:
    Batteries    65 lbs
    Skeleton    25 lbs
    Muscle       30 lbs
    Tendon        5 lbs
    Skin            20 lbs
------------------------------
                       145 lbs

Weight of electronics and optics:
   optical system:   5 lbs
   brain system   :   5 lbs
   Maxillofacial
     complex:           3 lbs
   neocortex:           3 lbs
   skin pre proces:  1 lbs
   auditory                1 lbs
   vocation and diaphram
                                  5 lbs
   gyroscopic             3 lbs
   muscle sub contrl  5 lbs
----------------------------------------
                           31 lbs
--------------------------------
               total: 176 lbs

Offering / Product:

4 Unit Rescue Team: $100,000,000
    4 SARC Units, May choose any 4 (Regular, RadHard, Bodyguard, Micro, High Temp, HeavyLift)
        Limited to two specialty units. For more add 20M per unit.
    2 Control Pods
        Upgrade to 4 control pods for $20M highly recommended for nuclear installations
    Note: Specialty High Temp and Heavy SARC only available in this package
    If purchasing the High Temp SARC her heat suit is included.
  

Add Ons: 
    Micro Surgery Kit   $500,000
    Cutting Tools For Rescue and Construction $500,000
    Heat Cutting Tool for Rescue: 50,000
    Advanced Lift (shoulder add on increases lift to 450 lbs): $1,500,000
    Radiation Suit: $100,000
    BulletProof-ness: $500,000 (requires enhanced power and musculature)
    Enhanced Vision for Long distance object analysis and IR vision
    Foreign Languages / 2nd Language Installation (English + Japanese)

Sales Analysis
Nuclear Facilities around the world: 500

SARCDev, the development arm of SARC is currently seeking early purchase orders and investors. For more information please contact SARC Development at SARCDevelopment @ gmail.com

Wednesday, June 26, 2013

Lady Swineburn's Roundet d'etet

that old bum had he napoleans head he surely woulda sung
effegies for fleacers and pre raphaelites
a long stream of sneezes
among the uptights
anactoria's embrace
although lewd made haste
as sappho caught her taste
and history was undone

a screaching parlance a mischevious dance
Poe's passing said he launched in greatness
the last of the enchanced
what meat begins with the letter G?
Ask not old man swineburn
his lady, or the tree

Wednesday, June 19, 2013

Google Goofs With Ray Kurzweil

Ray Kurzweil wrote a book on "How to Create a Mind" and somehow Sergey Brin of Google was so dumb in these areas as to think that Kurzweil had said something significant. He hadn't. All Kurzweil did was rehash 1980s research and ideas by others and add a bit of modern brain imaging. Kurzweil is no more the messenger of how the brain works than Gould was for evolution. Both were huxsters and nothing more.

 Anyone who knows the history of A.I. will recognize that the basic theory (and even the diagrams that are used to illustrate it) is very much in the spirit of a textbook model of vision that was introduced in 1980, known as neocognitron.

Now that isn't to say that Kurzweil didn't start a music revolution with his synthesizer, and his blind reading machine, but that was 1960s technology and theres a big what have you done for me lately.

Sergey specifically hired Kurz to work on natural language processing, an area Ray knows little to nothing about.

I'm reminded of Hinton giving a ted talk about neural network recognition of individual letters. And as I watched I thought HEY this looks familiar. Nothing had changed since the 1980s. These old FRUMPS are not the leaders. Who are? Well people like me who are actually there in the details pushing on the real leading edge and testing mecanisms of neural design. Edelman's younger protege Olaf Sporns -Networks of the Brain

Even more disappointing is the fact that Kurzweil never bothers to do what any scientist, especially one trained in computer science, would immediately want to do, which is to build a computer model that instantiated his theory, and then compare the predictions of the model with real human behavior. Does the P.R.T.M. predict anything about human behavior that no other theory has predicted before? Does it give novel insight into any long-standing puzzles in human nature? Kurzweil never tries to find out.

Tuesday, June 18, 2013

From Windows 7 To Linux Mint - The Lenovo Dragon Breathes Peacefully

I've been struggling to do development on my big lenovo dual pentium 3.4 gHz machine using windows 7. When pushed, this box goes into full dragon mode and huge fans scream to life as the CPUs peg 100% usage. The problem is, in Windows 7, it seems like doing almost ANYTHING pegs the CPU at 100% all part of the NSA spying software they've installed no doubt.

When the system would come back from sleep it would animate through all the background images I had missed locking my system for ten minutes.

Countless times the whole thing would just freeze up. Gool ol Indian H-1B engineering no doubt. So, while Windows 7 runs great on a i7 8 core CPU it runs like crap on  a brute of a box that it should be screamingly fast on. What gives? Obviously all the developers hadn't bothered to test it with older boxes.

Well it got so bad I couldn't run a database, a browser, and eclipse at the same time. So I gave up and installed MINT. Unlike PeppermintOS which is ugly MINT is a full 1 Giga distribution so you can't just slap it on a CD. So I put in a DVD and tried to burn it BUT turns out my refurb has only DVD reading capabilities. That sucks. OK so I slapped it on my smart key and used Auto-Load partition to get it recognized as a proper drive. It ran. But unlike when you boot with it and are allowed to test it all out it just asked "do you want to install it into your windows.." and feeling terrified I was about to blow away my boot I paused.

Then I got angry. Hell yeah blow away windows. I don't care I cant take it any more!

So I clicked. And in a few minutes MINT came up. And my windows 7 boot was nicely preserved.

And then it dawned on me. The beautiful silence. Both CPUs were running at 15%. Which was as it should be. In fact I cannot ever get the CPU to run at 100% dragon breath mode on Linux.

American engineers. God bless em.

Friday, May 17, 2013

JSON Exposed Repositories & EclipseLink vs. Linq

There is a devilishly difficult pattern question in java architecture which is emerging as new deviceology throws us to the wolves of mobile devices and cloud beastments which is the ubiquitous need for json-able ORMs and AJAX feeders for data.  After three years pondering a hand hacked and painful repository pattern using hand squaged DAOs floating over Linq For Buggy Entities 3.5 and Linq for almost fixed Entities 4.0 that can now finally expose a property used in a link rather than force you to use a table trigger - I finally came to explore the tough patterns back in the java world which had gotten somewhat better but not completely.

So the first devil sausage says use the beatiful new JPA plugin which does visualization in Eclipse Juno to blast out your db tables and your entity beans then just slam some JSF and some pretty facets and UI wonders into the front end and blammo beaty and beauty for not much cost and time. To put darning on the socks EclipseLink will now also blast out all the JSON you need over rest for your AJAX calls.

But what if you chose the pure route - ditch the JSF and go straight HTML with Javascript and a boofy subslather like Knockout or Angular. Is this heresy to the java world? Moreover will you lose all the pretties that you get with something like PrimeFAces and other nice beasts?

It's a tough one. More and more JSF client workups seem dated and old. But on the other side if you've GOT the power of JSF why not use it. tough tough.

Things are changing as cloud and mobile demand robust ajax servers and tooling to spin json at a mile a minute. the question is can the developers keep up. You would think that after 100 years of this someone would set up a model centric framework that just blasts out all the rest for you. No not Roo. And not stuff that starts with clunky UML either.

In a way I kinda like the new graphical entity modeler in Eclipse. It's def the way to go. Now if they can just include the JAXB annotation properties and intelligent defaulting so you get BOTH XML, JSON and entities all keyed out right. Still it's miles ahead of Linq and .Net.

Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Books hit New Zealand. Look out world!


Did they have to translate it into New Zealandish?

New Book - Foundational Principles of Cognitive Cybernetics

I've been stumbling with this one. It's my first serious book. I want something that will change the world. It's no small task.

What is cognitive cybernetics? And what are foundational principles? It attacks what must be the basis for developing synthetic thought, real thinking intelligent machines. 

I got so mad reading Kurzweils childish pathetic attempt to understand all this that I just had to throw my gauntlet down in the ring.

In the meantime, "Poems for College Curmudgeons" will be coming out soon. A more light hearted affair. But this book, this big book sometimes I crumple into a paper ball just thinking of the hugeness and difficulty. I worry it will be a decade to complete but somehow it needs doing now. Onward.