The Big Bang is a MIS-Interpretation of a Vibrating Universe

Doppler light shift. This one phenom is the basis for the expanding universe. So we assume galaxies are flying apart.

That brought Idiot Hawkings the notion of expansion in reverse - the Big Bang.

But what if doppler light shift is not a result of velocity, but rather, the cumulated effect of vibration pattern waves on light motion.  A sort of standing still movement that accumulates.

In this paradigm, the universe is stable not expanding, and the Big Bang never happened.

Somewhere in my immense vast spare time I have a book in the works "After Einstein, the Vibrationary Model of the Universe" but alas, I'm so stuffed at the moment and there's one or two books ahead of it! So until then you'll have to settle for the interesting but inchoate and lesser treatise on quantum lattice structures (which I now refer to as aethertons) and the earlier writings by Lorentz before he caved to the Einsteinians under pressure. Poor Lorentz.

Why most Suns form as binary systems and why we live in a binary system

Our sun's binary companion - Nibiru - which is in long elliptical orbit many times more vast than Pluto's, swings in every 26,000 years. When it does, an interference pattern forms which is the Shamash, which is shown in many many Akkadian and Summerian carvings. The pyramids and the large granite caskets were shelters from the intense heat and radiation, and flooding. The royals would climb in and spend a month inside with food, and finally their minders, in their last act before dying, would pry the lids and release them. They would enter an Earth unlike anything they could imagine, a vast wasteland, a slate wiped clean of civilization. What little survived would be wild, untamed starting over as apes in the trees. Humans free of knowledge. The few human survivors would build primitive huts, but the world of math and science and technology would be utterly lost.

That is the premise for my new book - The Re-Seeders, which discusses the legends of the Fish scaled bearded ones who re-established culture and science across the globe, whose powers astounded the primitive peoples.

But for now, let's discuss some fundamental physics of star formation. The hydrogen, that's the pure stuff. and that's the driver of the furnace. But what about the impure elements that exist at star formation. For years we assumed they simply remained within the massive star and the gravitational forces formed higher and ever higher order elements with heavier molecular weights.

But what if star formation was more like a crucible, a puddler's boil of lead, where to make a good casting they have to scrape off the slag, the top sludge of impurities.  What if to be a fully functioning furnace of fusion (gee thats amazing alliteration huh?) the star has to eject that impure set of heavier elements. Would they rise to the top or sink to the bottom? A forming star is sparse. So there would be time for the heavier elements to coalesce and slowly gather like a large planet, and then the outward push of heat as the star activates would thrust the heavy particles out perhaps in a massive ball ejection. and at that very moment, achieving purity, the flames of fusion would ignite.

And the cast out ball would get thrown into a wild distant elliptical orbit.  The weight of ten Jupiters in a mass smaller than Jupiter. A kind of metal star. But without fire. Without a heart of fusion. A dark object. That would be very hard to find with a telescope of any kind.

In the past few years astronomers have painstakingly measured the rate at which stars and gas clouds in the outer parts of spiral galaxies are orbiting the center of mass of those galaxies. Optical photographs show spiral galaxies to be graceful pinwheels of billions of stars, with the light falling off steadily from the central to the outer regions. Since the light is produced by stars, we naturally expect the matter and its associated gravitational force field to show a similar concentration. It follows, then, that the speed of rotation of the stars and gas should decline as one moves from the inner to the outer regions of galaxies.
Much to the surprise and consternation of astronomers, this is not what is observed. As radio and optical observations have extended the velocity measurements for the stars and gas to the outer regions of spiral galaxies, they have found that the stars and gas clouds are moving at the same speed as the ones closer in! A substantial part of the mass of the galaxy is not concentrated toward the center of the galaxy but must be [160] distributed in some dark, unseen halo surrounding the visible galaxy. The outer regions of galaxies, faint and inconspicuous on a photograph, may actually contain most of the matter. In the words of astronomers Margaret and Geoffrey Burbidge, it appears that "the tail wags the dog."

Perhaps this heavy element ejection theory explains the missing matter. If all stars produced companion metal stars in their formation, then this explains the perfect balance of galaxial rotation BETTER than the black hole at the center of the galaxy theory.

But we do detect odd wobbles.  The out planet orbits don't quite conform to our laws of gravity. This first allowed us to extract out the notion of a PLUTO planetoid years before confirming its existance. And now again, because it is so far out so vastly far out, it's effect is ever so tiny.

In January 2015, Caltech astronomers Konstantin Batygin and Mike Brown announced new research that provides evidence of a giant planet tracing an unusual, elongated orbit in the outer solar system. The prediction is based on detailed mathematical modeling and computer simulations, not direct observation.

This large object could explain the unique orbits of at least five smaller objects discovered in the distant Kuiper Belt.

"The possibility of a new planet is certainly an exciting one for me as a planetary scientist and for all of us," said Jim Green, director of NASA's Planetary Science Division. "This is not, however, the detection or discovery of a new planet. It's too early to say with certainty there's a so-called Planet X. What we're seeing is an early prediction based on modeling from limited observations. It's the start of a process that could lead to an exciting result."

The Caltech scientists believe Planet X may have has a mass about 10 times that of Earth and be similar in size to Uranus or Neptune. The predicted orbit is about 20 times farther from our sun on average than Neptune (which orbits the sun at an average distance of 2.8 billion miles). It would take this new planet between 10,000 and 20,000 years to make just one full orbit around the sun (where Neptune completes an orbit roughly every 165 years). - NASA

For the moment. Our companion metal sun is dark and leathal.  When it comes crashing in, we see the zodiac precession accelerate dramatically from 1/72 of a degree arc per year to 100 times that. This means it is end times, the days of great flames. Why does this happen? It is literally the mass of Nibiru our metal star steering our entire solar system sideways against the ecliptic. Will we build our pyramids when we see it? Or escape into far out space only to return to re-seed our own people.